Friday, May 16, 2008

Evangelical right pushes back on climate change

For all their drawbacks, Dobson, Perkins and others are performing a valuable service here by establishing a right flank on this issue. That said, it would have been nice if they could have secured the support an evangelical of note who is not so identified with the right wing. Because they didn't the press will chalk this up as more reactionary rhetoric and the further splintering of the evangelical movement.

WASHINGTON - Evangelical leaders who reject arguments that climate change is human-induced but are nevertheless concerned about the environment are trying to gather 1 million signatures of people who agree with them.

The "We Get It!" campaign, launched May 15 at the National Press Club, includes a brief declaration that states "God created everything" and there is a God-given mandate to "tend his creation" and care for the poor.

"Our stewardship of creation must be based on biblical principles and factual evidence," the four-paragraph statement reads. "We face important environmental challenges, but must be cautious of claims that our planet is in peril from speculative dangers like man-made global warming."

The campaign is the latest in the back-and-forth battle between different strains of evangelicals. Some believe action is needed to protect the environment because human activity has caused its degradation, while others believe the notion of human cause is a fad and alarmist.

"We're here to say evangelicals as a whole, evangelicals even as a significant part, have not suddenly embraced man-made catastrophic global warming alarmism," said E. Calvin Beisner, spokesman for the Cornwall Alliance, one of the partner organizations leading the campaign.

Other participants in the launch of the new campaign included Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla.; Institute on Religion and Democracy President James Tonkowich; and Family Research Council President Tony Perkins.

"You can be green without being gullible," said Perkins.

3 comments:

anon said...

It is too bad that this issue polarizes evangelicals, but I think this move is the right one. I think Perkins is unwise to call lib evangelicals "gullible." It's a pithy line, but we conservatives need to stay above the ad hominem.

My question is: why now? Why not two years ago, when the lib evangelicals came out with the evangelical climate iniative?

Titus said...

Good question. I do think the Evangelical Manifesto played in to this timing -- even though it wasn't specifically about climate change. Also, just yesterday McCain gave his big pro-climate change speech. Plus, last month there was that totally one-sided faith forum in PA with Clinton and Obama.

Finally, the Senate is poised to take up the cap and trade bill, and I bet Inhofe asked them to do this in advance of the Senate debate.

anon said...

Shrewd on Inhofe's part.